Comments on: 70% of websites don’t last 3 years without optimisation?

By: Edward

Edward — Sun, 21 Jul 2013 18:16:21 +0000

I believe the failure rate for small business websites is a direct result of marketing information, or the lack of it. For instance, which marketing firms talk about pull marketing? Another name for pull marketing is called “Marketing by Attraction.”

The web pulls because the search engines pull. The engines pull up the top 10 because the information is attractive.

But, push marketing is where the money is made for web marketers and so they steer their clients in this direction.

Push marketing on the web is an all out effort that few can afford, even though the results can be instantaneous when it is successful. There is no point in pushing just a little and falling short, so it is not the best way for a small business to market itself. And when you stop funding the push campaign it dies right there.

Pull marketing can be built up slowly at an owner’s pace and every bit of effort stays in place for a long time. Eventually, a consistent effort will reach critical mass and a local market will become aware of the business.

Web marketing doesn’t talk about pull marketing so many small business owners were never made aware of the choices in web marketing.

Failure is a result of pushing when you should be pulling.

Success is pushing when you should be pushing.

By: Net Mind

Net Mind — Mon, 23 Jan 2012 18:34:37 +0000

Internet business failure is about 99.9% or higher. Internet business takes alot of time to make money. Anybody can start the business. What stats do you have to back up your comment? I’d be interested to know. In my experience, the internet failure rate is around 80% BM

By: Vango Icarus 500

Vango Icarus 500 — Thu, 22 Sep 2011 22:46:49 +0000

Lol nice comments above. This one is ironic, then? The spamtwats above are all out of business now, kinda shows spamming blogs doesn’t work, don’tya think?

By: direct mail spammer

direct mail spammer — Mon, 22 Mar 2010 10:27:29 +0000

direct mail statistics... Last Monday I visit your Optimisation statistics - website failure rate statistics ... site, I have a special experience after reading your direct mail statistics site/blog.... and I have a special experience when I read you continual comment spam you pathetic spamtwat! BM

By: Useless Spam Bastard

Useless Spam Bastard — Tue, 13 Jan 2009 10:24:55 +0000

I can’t be bothered reading your article, because I’m simply a spam bastard looking for links to my site so I’ll write the following: It sounds interesting but I am not sure that I agree with you completely…. It’s what I write when I’m spamming blogs trying to find links. I really am a useless spam bastard - am I not?

By: The Big Man

The Big Man — Sat, 27 Dec 2008 12:54:52 +0000

Hello to the guys at improve-search-engine-placement-pro.com. Please expand my thoughts? Ok, I think it would be helpful if the improve-search-engine-placement-pro.com link spammer had the sense to read the article and actually made a comment that relates to the article. It’s obvious that their spam linker doesn’t read bugger-all, as this is the fourth piece of spam from improve-search-engine-placement-pro.com in the last few days, and each one says the same - and all to different blog entries! Duh!!!!

By: positioning seo services

positioning seo services — Sat, 27 Dec 2008 10:18:32 +0000

positioning seo services spammers

After reading this post, I am not sure I understand what you are trying to relate. Is that because I’m a thick, no-talent spammer? We are a company called improve-search-engine-placement-pro.com that goes around spamming other company’s blogs, in the hope that we’ll get some link juice from the links. We, at improve-search-engine-placement-pro.com are really just a bunch of spam-bastards, who don’t have the sense, (or skills), to check for no-follow tags on blogs before wasting our time spamming them. Please expand on your thoughts a little more. Thanks…