<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DMOZ titles are raising their ugly heads again!</title>
	<link>http://www.kenkai.com/seo-blog-article-118.htm</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 17:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Big Man</title>
		<link>http://www.kenkai.com/seo-blog-article-118.htm#comment-159</link>
		<dc:creator>The Big Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 09:44:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.kenkai.com/seo-blog-article-118.htm#comment-159</guid>
		<description>It's true to say I didn't mention it in the DMOZ blocking article, but if your site isn't listed in DMOZ, (The Open Directory Project), or the Yahoo directory, there is no need to utilise any of these Meta Tags.

With regards to your question about internal pages, I haven't personally seen internal pages in the Google directory that feature DMOZ title or descriptions, but if you have any, adding the opt-out tags to any web page affected will resolve the issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s true to say I didn&#8217;t mention it in the DMOZ blocking article, but if your site isn&#8217;t listed in DMOZ, (The Open Directory Project), or the Yahoo directory, there is no need to utilise any of these Meta Tags.</p>
<p>With regards to your question about internal pages, I haven&#8217;t personally seen internal pages in the Google directory that feature DMOZ title or descriptions, but if you have any, adding the opt-out tags to any web page affected will resolve the issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jordan</title>
		<link>http://www.kenkai.com/seo-blog-article-118.htm#comment-158</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 08:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.kenkai.com/seo-blog-article-118.htm#comment-158</guid>
		<description>Is the adding of DMOZ titles and descriptions to Google listings much of an issue to new sites since the end of 2006?

With it being near impossible to submit a website to DMOZ, surely any sites that started in the last year will not need the NoODP tag.

Also, if any site has individual pages, (not just the homepage), listed in DMOZ, should they have the tag on them too?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is the adding of DMOZ titles and descriptions to Google listings much of an issue to new sites since the end of 2006?</p>
<p>With it being near impossible to submit a website to DMOZ, surely any sites that started in the last year will not need the NoODP tag.</p>
<p>Also, if any site has individual pages, (not just the homepage), listed in DMOZ, should they have the tag on them too?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
